Specification Drift Risk
The mandate terms are alive. The documentation is not.
Production logic, manual corrections and RM workarounds may describe a different client relationship than the original mandate paperwork.
Turn fifty years of client history into a competitive moat — bring us in before the people who understand the book retire.
A complete path
Three connected disciplines keep the programme focused on business meaning rather than technical movement alone.
Capture what lives in people's heads
We interview relationship managers, product specialists and IT veterans, and reverse-engineer decades of undocumented mandate logic before they walk out the door.
Move forward without losing the past
We migrate client, account and portfolio data and modernise core banking code with zero-loss precision — every mandate condition honoured, every collateral rule tested.
Turn legacy data into business intelligence
We structure historical holdings, transactions and mandate history as analytics your risk, compliance and relationship teams can actually use.
Has your data strategy become a business risk?
The dangerous failures are often interpretations that were never made explicit enough for someone to challenge.
The mandate terms are alive. The documentation is not.
Production logic, manual corrections and RM workarounds may describe a different client relationship than the original mandate paperwork.
The people who can explain the book are leaving.
Relationship manager and platform-specialist memory can disappear before the programme has recovered what the estate actually does.
Reconciliation can pass while the target still fails.
Matching balances does not prove that mandate history, entitlement logic, or Lombard collateral rules survived the migration.
A big-bang platform cutover hides the decision until late.
If evidence arrives only at go-live, the sponsor inherits complexity when the available choices are smallest.
Exceptions are part of the book.
Manual overrides, incomplete KYC fields and undocumented account structures need a decision, not silent translation.
A target core banking platform can become the new blind spot.
Choosing Avaloq, Temenos or another platform before recovering intent lets the vendor's data model decide what the relationship meant.
Migration workbench — illustrative workflow
Mandate lineage, fee and collateral variants and affected account history are pulled from the COBOL, AS/400, DB2 and Avaloq mixed estate while the people who understand it are still reachable.
Technologies we modernise
A banking migration may need to interpret core platforms, legacy languages, databases, message standards and operational files together. The exact scope belongs to discovery.
How we help
The right engagement shape follows the decision the bank needs to make, not a preselected technology sale.
Legacy account, portfolio and mandate data extracted with full temporal history preserved, validated across the whole relationship lifetime.
Separate business intent from implementation history so the organisation can decide what to preserve, change or retire.
Create a common account of overlapping rules, data and histories before merging estates after an acquisition or platform decision.
Reduce dependence on opaque code and individual memory while the organisation prepares its next move.
WAYS THE WORK COULD OPERATE
The estate, access model and internal capability shape the operating relationship. The material decisions stay visible in every version.
A working model for organisations that want Qubiz to carry the migration activity while business and engineering owners retain material decisions.
Talk to an Expert
Every banking engagement starts with the mandate history, the relationship-manager workflow, and the platform decision — not the technology stack. No discovery decks, just an honest conversation.
Book a scoping call
25+ years across IT domains. Lead Architect at Zurich Insurance, Helvetia, Swiss Re, Munich Re, Helsana.
FAQ
Bring software that's hard to change, data that can't support a decision, or a release whose evidence isn't strong enough.
No. A platform decision or post-merger complexity is enough on its own — the same discovery and validation approach applies whether or not a legacy core is involved.
It accelerates reading and drafting. Release decisions stay with accountable people — engineers and business owners remain responsible for material interpretations and acceptance.